The story is moving. Rewrite the era.Status checked 25 Sep 2026 · Sanctions and appeals may still change · No official reallocation of honours is stated.
Methodology

Change one thing.
Follow what changes.

We remove Manchester City's league results, rebuild the table, then calculate the financial consequences we can identify without pretending to know the whole alternative history.

01FACT

What happened

A sourced historical event, result or transfer. Facts are stated narrowly and should be traceable to primary or reputable reporting.

02DIRECT IMPACT

Where clubs met

A direct sporting interaction: finishing immediately behind City, City occupying a qualification place, a transfer from a club to City, or a cup elimination.

03COUNTERFACTUAL

What might have happened

A plausible alternative history. Always speculative, never presented as an official outcome, entitlement or finding.

01 · Rebuild the league

The No-City table

The table tells us what changed. Then we follow the money.

For every completed Premier League season in scope, we remove every Manchester City league fixture from every other club's record and recalculate the table.

  • Remove both City fixtures from each other club's record.
  • Recalculate points, wins, draws, losses, goals for and goals against.
  • Rank clubs by points, then goal difference, then goals scored.
  • Remove Manchester City entirely, leaving a 19-club counterfactual table. The bottom three — 17th, 18th and 19th — are relegated.

This is not an official table, a proposed sanction, or a prediction of how matches would have unfolded. It changes one input and keeps the rest of the recorded season fixed.

02 · Premier League money

What moving one place was worth

Each Premier League finishing position carries a season-specific value through position-linked central distributions. We use the published value for that season and apply it to the club's actual and No-City finishing positions.

From 2019/20, position-linked international merit is also part of the distribution system, so the per-place value is higher than the older domestic-merit-only era.

SeasonApprox. value per league place
2009/10£0.800m
2010/11£0.757m
2011/12£0.755m
2012/13£0.756m
2013/14£1.236m
2014/15£1.245m
2015/16£1.242m
2016/17£1.942m
2017/18£1.931m
2018/19£1.919m
2019/20~£3.180m*
2020/21£2.164m
2021/22£2.057m
2022/23~£3.110m
2023/24~£2.820m
2024/25~£2.655m
*2019/20 is treated as an estimate because the COVID-era distribution structure makes a simple per-place figure less clean than surrounding seasons.
03 · Europe

When a changed table crosses a qualification line

If a club's No-City finish moves it into a different European competition, we record the change and model the associated UEFA revenue difference.

We value the changed UEFA campaign against actual distributions to comparable English clubs. The lower case uses the lowest comparable English non-winning receipt in the higher competition; the central case uses the median. Competition winners are excluded, and season-average EUR→GBP conversion is used when rolling the values into sterling.

We do not count sponsorship uplift, extra matchday income, transfer effects or long-term commercial growth from European participation.

04 · Relegation

The financial cliff

When the No-City table changes a club from relegated to surviving, we value one additional Premier League season and stop there.

The conservative version uses the following season's 20th-place Premier League central distribution and subtracts the first-year parachute payment the club actually received. A club only qualifies if it moves from an actual relegation place to 16th or higher in the 19-team No-City table.

We do not assume the club survives again, gets promoted later, keeps the same squad or follows the same managerial and transfer path.

Across the charged-period tables, Blackpool in 2010/11 are the only genuine relegation-to-survival reversal: 19th becomes 16th. The model adds £23.625m as the conservative identifiable relegation effect.

05 · Titles

Sporting consequence, not a second cheque

If the No-City table produces a different champion, we record that sporting consequence. We do not add a separate title bonus to the financial model because first-place Premier League merit money is already captured in the position calculation.

We also do not assign speculative values to the sponsorship, commercial, supporter-growth, recruitment or brand effects of winning a title.

06 · What we do not count

The number is deliberately narrow

We do not try to price every possible butterfly effect. The financial figure excludes:

  • Sponsorship and commercial uplift.
  • Player values and transfer-chain effects.
  • Different signings, managers or squad decisions.
  • Supporter growth and long-term brand value.
  • Future league performances after the timeline materially diverges.
  • Trophies or European runs that might have followed.
07 · What the number means

A modelled revenue impact, not a compensation claim

The financial figure is the minimum identifiable or modelled revenue effect produced by the No-City calculation under the assumptions above.

It does not mean Manchester City "owes" a club that amount, and it does not mean the alternative history would definitely have happened.

The principle is simple: change one thing — Manchester City's results — then follow the consequences we can actually measure.

Sources & data

Make the calculation checkable

There is no single official document containing the answer. Each headline figure should be traceable through four steps: the match results, the rebuilt table, the financial consequence and the source used to value it.

Where possible we use official Premier League and UEFA material. For older seasons, contemporary distribution records are used where the official archive is incomplete.

See something we've missed? Tell us. We'll check it.